Oregon's Public Housing Policy Debate
Is there anyone in the state of Oregon who believes that improving the quality of life in their neighborhood is achieved by OVERLOADING their own neighborhood with low-income public housing?
Some of the ideas for quantifying public housing location policy described below in the draft Standards for Equitable Distribution of Public Housing Resolution (formerly 3-6-9) have been included in the Analysis of Impediments To Fair Housing Report which has been adopted by Portland's Housing and Community Development Commission and also sent to HUD. These ideas need to be discussed by the Portland city council, the Gresham city council, the Multnomah county commission and others involved in public housing location policy and implementation.
DRAFT
Declare 5-10-15 Neighborhood Percentages As Transparent, Understandable and Accountable Distributive Public Housing Policy Goals - Provide Compensation To Neighborhoods Above 15%
WHEREAS the city of Portland has an established policy that public housing clients should not be concentrated into a few select neighborhoods but rather distributed throughout Portlands neighborhoods,
WHEREAS it has become necessary to quantify the policy of distribution of public housing clients in order to assure that public expenditures are being spent in furtherance of these objectives,
WHEREAS it is necessary to adopt neighborhood map based accounting as a reporting and decision making tool regarding public housing policy and expenditures.
WHEREAS it is necessary to compensate neighborhoods that shoulder greater social responsibility than other neighborhoods by including more than 15% public housing clients.
WHEREAS for purposes of this resolution public housing shall be defined as requiring means test + government subsidy + rental agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the city of Portland shall establish as its primary public housing client goal in each Portland neighborhood a target of ten (10) percent of that neighborhood’s population. Goals for minimum and maximum shall be established so that no neighborhood shall have fewer than five (5) percent and no neighborhood shall have more than fifteen (15) percent of its population as public housing clients.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the office of the Portland City Auditor shall coordinate the collection of data and report annually on the status of accomplishment toward the 5-10-15 goal.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the city council shall fund the City Auditor’s 5-10-15 related activities by whatever combination of funding sources from HAP, PDC, BHCD or other revenue sources it may chose.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, all appointments for PDC, HAP and HCDC commissioner shall be made during the regular city council calendar.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the mayor shall determine that all nominees to become HAP, PDC and HCDC commissioners agree to support the 5-10-15 policy goal before being formally nominated for council approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, during the confirmation proceedings the mayor shall publicly instruct the appointee of his or her obligation to use the office to which they are appointed to further the 5-10-15 policy goal.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, neighborhoods with more than 15% public housing clients shall be considered “overloaded” and subject to compensation according to the following schedule:
$1,000/client/year from 15%-16%
$1,100/client/year from 16%-17%
$1,200/client/year from 17%-18%
Increasing $100/client/year for every additional percentage point.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, payments for compensating 15%+ “overloaded” neighborhoods shall be made annually to the affected neighborhood associations. Compensation funding may only be used for Arts related activities e.g. purchases of artwork, performances, classes etc. Compensation funding may not be used for any social services activity or purpose.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Office of Neighborhood Involvement shall annually issue a Neighborhood Art Card to every address in those neighborhoods which qualify for “overload” compensation. The card will allow four persons to participate in any activities sponsored by the neighborhood named on the card. The card shall contain the neighborhood budget for the year of issuance and an explanation of why it has been issued.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this resolution is binding city policy.
|
67% of Multnomah County Neighborhoods Already Meet the 3-6-9 Guidelines
|
||
|
HAP Clients as % of population
|
Neighborhood
|
Total # of HAP Clients
|
|
52.75
|
Hollywood
|
613
|
|
18.39
|
Portsmouth
|
1463
|
|
13.15
|
Cathedral Park
|
359
|
|
12.37
|
Northwest District
|
1374
|
|
10.28
|
Reed
|
283
|
|
9.03
|
Humboldt
|
444
|
|
7.61
|
Eliot
|
211
|
|
7.55
|
Irvington
|
506
|
|
7.26
|
Glenfair
|
170
|
|
6.71
|
King
|
387
|
|
6.59
|
Boise
|
226
|
|
6.11
|
Sellwood-Moreland
|
634
|
|
3.35
|
Hollybrook-G
|
228
|
|
3.33
|
Rose City Park
|
294
|
|
3.08
|
Russell
|
106
|
|
3.08
|
Hayhurst
|
144
|
|
3.07
|
West Portland Park
|
115
|
|
3.04
|
Mt. Hood-G
|
228
|
|
2.97
|
Northeast-G
|
262
|
|
2.96
|
North-G
|
228
|
|
2.87
|
Laurelhurst
|
128
|
|
2.85
|
Sunderland
|
2
|
|
2.64
|
Maplewood
|
60
|
|
2.56
|
Hillsdale
|
195
|
To see the complete table for all neighborhoods in Multnomah county go here: Complete Table
All percentages and totals are estimates based on the best available information. For more accurate data contact mayor Potter and support the 3-6-9 Resolution.

Click Here to SEE LARGE MAP,
a graphic representation of the Estimated HAP Client Population By Neighborhood In Multnomah County
|
Estimated HAP Client Population By Neighborhood In Multnomah County
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HAP Classifications
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0-30 % Median Income
|
31-50 % Median Income
|
51-80 % Median Income
|
Neighborhood Totals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Multnomah County
|
HAP Property
|
Section 8
|
Total
|
Total
|
% of All
|
HAP Property
|
Section 8
|
Total
|
Total
|
% of All
|
HAP Property
|
Section 8
|
Total
|
Total
|
% of All
|
Total HAP |
Total
|
Total All
|
% of All | % of All |
Multnomah County
|
||||||||
|
Neighborhoods
|
# Clients |
$ Costs
|
# Clients
|
$ Costs
|
# Clients |
$ Costs
|
0-30 Clients | # Clients |
$ Costs
|
# Clients
|
$ Costs
|
# Clients |
$ Costs
|
31-50 Clients | # Clients |
$ Costs
|
# Clients
|
$ Costs
|
# Clients
|
$ Costs
|
51-80 Clients |
Qualified
|
# Clients |
$ Costs
|
Clients
|
$ Costs
|
Neighborhoods
|
||
| 1 | Portsmouth | 824 | 2113734 | 344 | 882434 | 1168 | 2996168 | 4.79 | 186 | 318086 | 63 | 107739 | 249 | 425825 | 5.59 | 30 | 25652 | 16 | 13681 | 46 | 39333 | 4.04 | 5566 | 1463 | 3461326 | 4.88 | 4.86 | Portsmouth | 1 |
| 2 | Northwest District | 714 | 1831561 | 438 | 1123562 | 1152 | 2955123 | 4.72 | 98 | 167594 | 81 | 138521 | 179 | 306115 | 4.02 | 22 | 18812 | 21 | 17956 | 43 | 36768 | 3.78 | 7103 | 1374 | 3298006 | 4.58 | 4.63 | Northwest District | 2 |
| 3 | Centennial | 52 | 133391 | 641 | 1644300 | 693 | 1777691 | 2.84 | 16 | 27362 | 118 | 201797 | 134 | 229159 | 3.01 | 4 | 3420 | 31 | 26507 | 35 | 29927 | 3.08 | 10396 | 862 | 2036778 | 2.87 | 2.86 | Centennial | 3 |
| 4 | Lents | 16 | 41043 | 627 | 1608387 | 643 | 1649431 | 2.63 | 4 | 6841 | 116 | 198376 | 120 | 205217 | 2.69 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 25652 | 30 | 25652 | 2.64 | 10163 | 793 | 1880300 | 2.64 | 2.64 | Lents | 4 |
| 5 | Powellhurst-Gilbert | 54 | 138521 | 554 | 1421127 | 608 | 1559648 | 2.49 | 14 | 23942 | 102 | 174434 | 116 | 198376 | 2.6 | 8 | 6841 | 27 | 23087 | 35 | 29927 | 3.08 | 8974 | 759 | 1787952 | 2.53 | 2.51 | Powellhurst-Gilbert | 5 |
| 6 | Hazelwood | 0 | 544 | 1395475 | 544 | 1395475 | 2.23 | 0 | 100 | 171014 | 100 | 171014 | 2.24 | 0 | 26 | 22232 | 26 | 22232 | 2.28 | 8816 | 670 | 1588721 | 2.23 | 2.23 | Hazelwood | 6 | |||
| 7 | Sellwood-Moreland | 200 | 513042 | 345 | 884998 | 545 | 1398040 | 2.23 | 8 | 13681 | 64 | 109449 | 72 | 123130 | 1.62 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 14536 | 17 | 14536 | 1.49 | 5600 | 634 | 1535706 | 2.11 | 2.16 | Sellwood-Moreland | 7 |
| 8 | Cully | 26 | 66695 | 471 | 1208214 | 497 | 1274910 | 2.04 | 12 | 20522 | 87 | 148782 | 99 | 169304 | 2.22 | 2 | 1710 | 23 | 19667 | 25 | 21377 | 2.2 | 7628 | 621 | 1465591 | 2.07 | 2.06 | Cully | 8 |
| 9 | Richmond | 150 | 384782 | 349 | 895259 | 499 | 1280040 | 2.04 | 28 | 47884 | 64 | 109449 | 92 | 157333 | 2.06 | 8 | 6841 | 17 | 14536 | 25 | 21377 | 2.2 | 5652 | 616 | 1458750 | 2.05 | 2.05 | Richmond | 9 |
| 10 | Montavilla | 0 | 499 | 1280040 | 499 | 1280040 | 2.04 | 0 | 92 | 157333 | 92 | 157333 | 2.06 | 0 | 24 | 20522 | 24 | 20522 | 2.11 | 8092 | 615 | 1457895 | 2.05 | 2.05 | Montavilla | 10 | |||
| 11 | Hollywood | 522 | 1339040 | 45 | 115434 | 567 | 1454475 | 2.32 | 32 | 54725 | 8 | 13681 | 40 | 68406 | 0.9 | 4 | 3420 | 2 | 1710 | 6 | 5130 | 0.53 | 732 | 613 | 1528011 | 2.04 | 2.15 | Hollywood | 11 |
| 12 | Unincorporated Mult. Co. | 0 | 495 | 1269779 | 495 | 1269779 | 2.03 | 0 | 91 | 155623 | 91 | 155623 | 2.04 | 0 | 24 | 20522 | 24 | 20522 | 2.11 | 8023 | 610 | 1445924 | 2.03 | 2.03 | Unincorporated Mult. Co. | 12 | |||
| 13 | St. Johns | 48 | 123130 | 385 | 987606 | 433 | 1110736 | 1.77 | 28 | 47884 | 71 | 121420 | 99 | 169304 | 2.22 | 12 | 10261 | 19 | 16246 | 31 | 26507 | 2.72 | 6244 | 563 | 1306548 | 1.88 | 1.84 | St. Johns | 13 |
| 14 | City of Troutdale | 0 | 425 | 1090215 | 425 | 1090215 | 1.74 | 0 | 78 | 133391 | 78 | 133391 | 1.75 | 0 | 21 | 17956 | 21 | 17956 | 1.85 | 6889 | 524 | 1241562 | 1.75 | 1.74 | City of Troutdale | 14 | |||
| 15 | Brentwood/Darlington | 24 | 61565 | 393 | 1008128 | 417 | 1069693 | 1.71 | 10 | 17101 | 72 | 123130 | 82 | 140232 | 1.84 | 2 | 1710 | 19 | 16246 | 21 | 17956 | 1.85 | 6366 | 520 | 1227881 | 1.73 | 1.72 | Brentwood/Darlington | 15 |
| 16 | Irvington | 182 | 466868 | 231 | 592564 | 413 | 1059432 | 1.69 | 36 | 61565 | 42 | 71826 | 78 | 133391 | 1.75 | 4 | 3420 | 11 | 9406 | 15 | 12826 | 1.32 | 3751 | 506 | 1205649 | 1.69 | 1.69 | Irvington | 16 |
| 17 | Concordia | 44 | 112869 | 360 | 923476 | 404 | 1036345 | 1.66 | 14 | 23942 | 66 | 112869 | 80 | 136811 | 1.8 | 4 | 3420 | 17 | 14536 | 21 | 17956 | 1.85 | 5832 | 505 | 1191113 | 1.68 | 1.67 | Concordia | 17 |
| 18 | Humboldt | 160 | 410434 | 206 | 528433 | 366 | 938867 | 1.5 | 26 | 44464 | 38 | 64985 | 64 | 109449 | 1.44 | 4 | 3420 | 10 | 8551 | 14 | 11971 | 1.23 | 3342 | 444 | 1060287 | 1.48 | 1.49 | Humboldt | 18 |
| 19 | Downtown | 10 | 25652 | 338 | 867041 | 348 | 892693 | 1.43 | 2 | 3420 | 62 | 106029 | 64 | 109449 | 1.44 | 4 | 3420 | 16 | 13681 | 20 | 17101 | 1.76 | 5479 | 432 | 1019244 | 1.44 | 1.43 | Downtown | 19 |
| 20 | Buckman | 18 | 46174 | 300 | 769563 | 318 | 815737 | 1.3 | 2 | 3420 | 55 | 94058 | 57 | 97478 | 1.28 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 11971 | 14 | 11971 | 1.23 | 4873 | 389 | 925186 | 1.3 | 1.3 | Buckman | 20 |
| 21 | King | 66 | 169304 | 249 | 638738 | 315 | 808041 | 1.29 | 8 | 13681 | 46 | 78666 | 54 | 92348 | 1.21 | 6 | 5130 | 12 | 10261 | 18 | 15391 | 1.58 | 4036 | 387 | 915780 | 1.29 | 1.29 | King | 21 |
| 22 | Creston-Kenilworth | 14 | 35913 | 298 | 764433 | 312 | 800346 | 1.28 | 4 | 6841 | 55 | 94058 | 59 | 100898 | 1.32 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 11971 | 14 | 11971 | 1.23 | 4827 | 385 | 913215 | 1.28 | 1.28 | Creston-Kenilworth | 22 |
| 23 | Kenton | 42 | 107739 | 256 | 656694 | 298 | 764433 | 1.22 | 6 | 10261 | 47 | 80377 | 53 | 90637 | 1.19 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 10261 | 12 | 10261 | 1.05 | 4150 | 363 | 865331 | 1.21 | 1.22 | Kenton | 23 |
| 24 | Cathedral Park | 202 | 518173 | 107 | 274478 | 309 | 792650 | 1.27 | 22 | 37623 | 19 | 32493 | 41 | 70116 | 0.92 | 4 | 3420 | 5 | 4275 | 9 | 7696 | 0.79 | 1747 | 359 | 870462 | 1.2 | 1.22 | Cathedral Park | 24 |
| 25 | Mt. Tabor | 0 | 285 | 731085 | 285 | 731085 | 1.17 | 0 | 52 | 88927 | 52 | 88927 | 1.17 | 0 | 14 | 11971 | 14 | 11971 | 1.23 | 4618 | 351 | 831983 | 1.17 | 1.17 | Mt. Tabor | 25 | |||
| 26 | Foster-Powell | 0 | 279 | 715694 | 279 | 715694 | 1.14 | 0 | 51 | 87217 | 51 | 87217 | 1.14 | 0 | 13 | 11116 | 13 | 11116 | 1.14 | 4529 | 343 | 814027 | 1.14 | 1.14 | Foster-Powell | 26 | |||
| 27 | Rockwood-G | 82 | 210347 | 185 | 474564 | 267 | 684911 | 1.09 | 20 | 34203 | 34 | 58145 | 54 | 92348 | 1.21 | 4 | 3420 | 9 | 7696 | 13 | 11116 | 1.14 | 3007 | 334 | 788375 | 1.11 | 1.11 | Rockwood-G | 27 |
| 28 | Multnomah | 60 | 153913 | 200 | 513042 | 260 | 666955 | 1.07 | 16 | 27362 | 37 | 63275 | 53 | 90637 | 1.19 | 4 | 3420 | 9 | 7696 | 13 | 11116 | 1.14 | 3247 | 326 | 768708 | 1.09 | 1.08 | Multnomah | 28 |
| 29 | Hosford-Abernethy | 0 | 263 | 674651 | 263 | 674651 | 1.08 | 0 | 48 | 82087 | 48 | 82087 | 1.08 | 0 | 13 | 11116 | 13 | 11116 | 1.14 | 4273 | 324 | 767853 | 1.08 | 1.08 | Hosford-Abernethy | 29 | |||
| 30 | Woodstock | 0 | 254 | 651564 | 254 | 651564 | 1.04 | 0 | 47 | 80377 | 47 | 80377 | 1.05 | 0 | 12 | 10261 | 12 | 10261 | 1.05 | 4118 | 313 | 742201 | 1.04 | 1.04 | Woodstock | 30 | |||
| 31 | Argay | 50 | 128261 | 165 | 423260 | 215 | 551520 | 0.88 | 36 | 61565 | 30 | 51304 | 66 | 112869 | 1.48 | 16 | 13681 | 8 | 6841 | 24 | 20522 | 2.11 | 2673 | 305 | 684911 | 1.02 | 0.96 | Argay | 31 |
| 32 | Mt. Scott-Arleta | 0 | 246 | 631042 | 246 | 631042 | 1.01 | 0 | 45 | 76956 | 45 | 76956 | 1.01 | 0 | 12 | 10261 | 12 | 10261 | 1.05 | 3985 | 303 | 718259 | 1.01 | 1.01 | Mt. Scott-Arleta | 32 | |||
| 33 | Sunnyside | 0 | 245 | 628477 | 245 | 628477 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 76956 | 45 | 76956 | 1.01 | 0 | 12 | 10261 | 12 | 10261 | 1.05 | 3973 | 302 | 715694 | 1.01 | 1.01 | Sunnyside | 33 | |||
| 34 | Piedmont | 0 | 239 | 613085 | 239 | 613085 | 0.98 | 0 | 44 | 75246 | 44 | 75246 | 0.99 | 0 | 11 | 9406 | 11 | 9406 | 0.97 | 3875 | 294 | 697737 | 0.98 | 0.98 | Piedmont | 34 | |||
| 35 | Rose City Park | 0 | 239 | 613085 | 239 | 613085 | 0.98 | 0 | 44 | 75246 | 44 | 75246 | 0.99 | 0 | 11 | 9406 | 11 | 9406 | 0.97 | 3880 | 294 | 697737 | 0.98 | 0.98 | Rose City Park | 35 | |||
Click Here To See Complete Chart of All 117 Neighborhoods
Methodology
Introduction
Every attempt was made to extrapolate from the available data a reasonable, consistent and publicly defensible estimate of the total number of HAP clients and costs by neighborhood in Multnomah County.
HAP Property Data
The construction of this table began with data provided by Steve Rudman, HAP Executive Director, which listed a significant number of HAP owned properties and the total occupancy by household and HAP category.
The address of each property was used to assign it to a neighborhood.
Each household was assigned a value of two persons.
Section 8 Data
Since there was no Section 8 data provided by HAP it was necessary to construct a formula to determine the number of Section 8 clients per neighborhood.
Total Section 8 clients must equal 30,000 (HAPs total client population) minus the number of clients living on HAP property.
Each of HAPs three separate client categories, Low Income 51-80%, Lower Income 31-50% and Lowest Income 0-30% were used to calculate the relative number of each group compared to the total for all groups. Low Income 51-80% = 4%, Lower Income 31-50% = 15% and Lowest Income 0-30% = 81%.
The total number of HAP eligible households per neighborhood was determined by using information provided by the Office of Neighborhood Involvement Web Site Neighborhood Demographics pages.
The Formula: maximum number of HAP eligible households per neighborhood * group percentage (4,15,or 81) * .07624 (this number will cause the total Section 8 clients to = 30000 - total number persons living on HAP property.
For consistency the same formula was used to calculate the number of HAP Section 8 voucher clients for every neighborhood in Multnomah County. (It is most likely that the number of HAP Section 8 clients, 7.6% of eligible households, was overestimated in the low HAP client percentage neighborhoods and underestimated in the high HAP client percentage neighborhoods.)
Costs
HAPs budget for FY 2001 was $71,200,000.
It was assumed that the cost of housing a client on HAP property or Section 8 voucher would be the same within each of HAPs three economic groupings.
It was assumed that HAPs cost would increase with client need so that Low Income would get X dollars of support, Lower Income would get 2X dollars and Lowest Income would get 3X dollars support.
Low Income per person = $855, Lower Income = $1710, Lowest income = $2565.
|
Own Versus Rent
|
||
|
Home Owner
|
Renter | |
| United States of America |
68.0%
|
32.0% |
| State of Oregon |
64.3%
|
35.7% |
| Multnomah County |
56.9%
|
43.1% |
| City of Portland |
55.8%
|
44.2% |
| Portsmouth Neighborhood |
48.0%
|
52.0% |
***********************************************************************************************
A History of HAP Watcher Commentaries, Reports, Relevant Emails Etc. From February 26, 2001 To The Present
Richard Ellmyer De Facto Multnomah County HAP Nominee 5-5-08
During the FIVE MONTH vacancy for a Multnomah county HAP seat, not a single candidate has been recruited nor recommended for the job by any Multnomah county commissioner nor any candidate for Multnomah county commissioner.
Public housing is a $200,000,000 a year enterprise in Mutlnomah county. HAP spends about $90,000,000. The citizens of Multnomah county are due their representation on the HAP board from someone who will serve their interests. Unfortunately, there is NO REPRESENTATION for the interests of Multnomah county property owners, business owners, neighborhoods and tax payers on the HAP board nor, for that matter, anywhere in the dark labyrinth of the public housing cult of beneficiaries.
The Portsmouth Neighborhood Association opposes the use of the former John Ball School site for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation. The Portsmouth Neighborhood Association wants to be more involved in finding a more suitable use for the site.
Nick Fish supports the discredited and abhorrent public policy of unlimited neighborhood concentration of public housing.
Nick Fish opposes the rights of Multnomah county taxpayers, voters and citizens to access public housing statistical data from the Housing Authority of Portland.
Nick Fish, a lawyer trained as a professional wordsmith, continues to purposely mislead the public by using the amorphous term "affordable" when he speaks about what he knows is, in fact, PUBLIC housing.
Erik Sten, the Darth Vader Overlord of public housing policy and policy makers in all of Multnomah county, is retiring to the dark side. Many years ago Sten astutely commandeered the public housing policy portfolio and turned it into a constituency builder by throwing as many taxpayer dollars at the public housing special interest community as he could find. The wider social and economic consequences of his political scheme on property owners, business owners, neighborhoods and taxpayers of Multnomah county were of no interest to him. Sten brilliantly substituted the word "affordable" for the word "public" whenever he talked about public housing to obfuscate his real intent. Erik Sten was the smartest and smoothest/slickest member of Portland's city council since Neil Goldschmidt.
I recently challenged the Portland city council to stop voting for HAP nominees based only on the candidate's presumed interest and history of public service but rather their positions on public housing policy. Without so much as a hint of acknowledgment to my testimony they proceeded to appoint a novice politico with no evidence of experience or even interest in public housing policy who had the intellectual cowardice and political hubris to publicly announce that he would NOT reveal his views on public housing policy until after he was confirmed. Of course, since his appointment he has not "revealed" his views nor can he because he has none. The Portland city council knowingly hired a carpenter who owned no woodworking tools and was unfamiliar with the difference between hard and soft woods. Would you make that kind of decision in your home or business?
In response to this disturbing and disgraceful public conduct, I, Richard Ellmyer, am provoked into placing my 33 years of political activism - including serving as campaign manager and personal staff advisor to Multnomah county commissioner Gladys McCoy from 1981 to 1984 - and, more importantly, my reasoned and defensible positions on public housing policy on the public table before the Multnomah county commission for consideration to serve the interests of Multnomah county as one of its HAP representatives.
First, dear reader, ask yourself: Do I believe that public institutions in Multnomah county should use tax moneys to concentrate public housing clients (means test + government subsidy + rental agreement) into a few select neighborhoods in Multnomah county effectively building low income housing ghettos?
Every vote by the Portland city council to confirm a citizen appointment to the board of the Housing Authority of Portland is a public affirmation of public housing policy in Multnomah county.
The time to vote for HAP nominees based only on their presumed interest or background in public service is past. The job of HAP commissioner is to make public housing policy which guides the spending of $90,000,000 in public funds every year. No vote should be cast by any Portland city commissioner without knowing the nominee's positions on a range of public housing policy issues.
Despite the fact that the job of an appointed commissioner to the Housing Authority of Portland is to discuss, debate and develop public housing policy, in the last seven years that I have been closely following the Housing Authority of Portland not a single nominee for the HAP board has ever been asked publicly to state his or her opinions on public housing policy, before, during or after the nominating process. This is a seriously flawed process and must be changed. That change will start with consideration of the next HAP nominee whose role is to serve the interests of the city of Gresham, Mike Bennett.
"The Kellogg Foundation is not a funder of the Portland Hope Meadows project. We have not given a past or current grant/loan to Portland Hope Meadows."
1-17-08 Ted H. Chen - Program Director, Youth & Education - W. K. Kellogg Foundation
The distortion, disrespect and disregard for process and the truth continues to envelope this ill conceived project. The Kellogg Foundation has no direct financial connection to the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation. This is news.
My colleagues, the times they are a changing. That annoying light of public housing statistical data Richard Ellmyer has been shining on our activities for almost seven years keeps getting brighter. Ellmyer's "sunshine" is finally exposing us by name as the citizens most responsible for perpetuating what Ellmyer calls the discredited and abhorrent public policy of unlimited neighborhood concentration of public housing in Multnomah county. Most disturbing are the increasing number of elected officials, candidates for public office, voters, taxpayers and now even some in the press that are awakening to Ellmyer's call to moral and fiscal accountability. Our days in the dark are numbered. It's time for a new strategy.
In a recent email vote a majority of the Interstate Corridor Urban Renewal Area Advisory Committee recently endorsed the following letter:
Dear Portland Development Commission:
We, the Interstate Corridor Urban Renewal Area Advisory Committee, support a public housing location policy of equitable distribution of public housing (defined as requiring three components: means test + government subsidy + rental agreement). This is consistent with the public housing location policy of the Portland Bureau of Housing and Community Development's published public housing location policy which is:
1. Maximize housing choice, especially for low-income people who have traditionally been limited in the location of housing that they could afford;
2. Discourage the concentration of low- or no- income households in any one area of the city;
3. Encourage the creation of additional housing resources for low-income households integrated throughout the community.
Portland city commissioners Sam Adams and Randy Leonard as well as John Branam, a candidate for Portland city commissioner, have demonstrated leadership abilities that we citizens crave, but rarely find, in our elected officials or candidates for public office. When they show it they need to be recognized and applauded. Thank you and Bravo!
John Fronhmayer, candidate for US Senate, has lead the way by being the first candidate for public office or holder of a public office in Oregon to publicly support the Oregon National Guard's need to own and occupy the decommissioned Sharff Army Reserve Center. Here is Frohnmayer's letter to our governor:
The practice of democracy requires that citizens have access to public records in order to hold those who wield power in government accountable. The Oregon Public Records law was created by our legislature to assure Oregonians their right to oversee the government employees that execute our laws and spend our money. Mike Schrunk's decision to protect the Housing Authority of Portland from divulging public data is not in keeping with the spirit or the letter of the Oregon Public Records law.
Unless the president of the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation, Rhonda Meadows, is a complete ignoramus (noun - an ignorant or stupid person.), she knows the difference between literal and figurative speech especially as written and distributed to 13,000 readers and published on the Internet as political commentary. Her recent complaint to the Portland police can only be seriously interpreted as a pathetically naive call for protection, not from physical harm but from the pain of public ridicule, shame and embarrassment which is the result of public exposure to the facts, truth and evidence of her own self-inflicted actions of ill repute:
PDC Commissioner Sal Kadri stands out as deserving attention and commendation for two enlightened acts of political courage.
Confronting UNLIMITED neighborhood concentration of public housing was the subject of a three hour public meeting February 21 attended by more than thirty Multnomah county voters genuinely and seriously interested in public housing policy. However, there was one person in attendance who came with a less than authentic civic minded concern about public housing policy. That person was, Erik Blythe, husband of the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation chair, Rhonda Meadows.
The winning public policy statement for the governor is to say that he not only supports the Oregon National Guard's need for the facilities at the Sharff ARC, he also supports a public housing policy of equitable distribution not unlimited neighborhood concentration of public housing clients. The governor will find that there is overwhelming public support for both of these policies and that it is in his and the public interest to publicly endorse both of them.
The reputation of the Morrison Center for doing good works will be publicly challenged and repudiated if it does not immediately withdraw its support for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation's plan to build public housing in the Portsmouth neighborhood of North Portland.
Carlton Hart - Support For Portland Hope Meadows Corporation Will Jeopardize Your Reputation 1-29-07
The reputation of Carlton Hart Architects for doing good works will be publicly challenged and repudiated if it does not immediately withdraw its support for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation's plan to build public housing in the Portsmouth neighborhood of North Portland.
Hope Meadows - Support For Portland Hope Meadows Corporation Will Jeopardize Your Reputation 1-29-07
The reputation of the University of Illinois and Hope Meadows for doing good works will be publicly challenged and repudiated if it does not immediately withdraw its support for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation's plan to build public housing in the Portsmouth neighborhood of North Portland.
The reputation of the Oregon Department of Human Services for doing good works will be publicly challenged and repudiated if it does not immediately withdraw its support for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation's plan to build public housing in the Portsmouth neighborhood of North Portland.
The reputation of the Kellogg foundation for doing good works will be publicly challenged and repudiated if it does not immediately withdraw its support for the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation's plan to build public housing in the Portsmouth neighborhood of North Portland.
The Portsmouth Neighborhood Association has arranged for one of its members, Richard Ellmyer, to coordinate and moderate a public meeting on Wednesday February 21 from 6-9 PM at the Historic Kenton Firehouse in North Portland, 2209 N. Schofield, to discuss public housing policy in Multnomah county and specifically the following agenda items:
Tom Potter, Dan Saltzman and Erik Sten gave $1,400,000 of OUR public property to persons that did not even reach the level of strangers to them. Potter, Saltzman and Sten stampeded over due process in order to give away public land to UNKNOWN individuals who would support the discredited and abhorrent public housing policy of UNlimited concentration of public housing in any neighborhood in Multnomah county.
HAP commissioners serve at the pleasure of the mayor of Portland (ORS 456.110) much as the Secretary of Defense serves at the pleasure of the President of the United States of America. EVERYTHING these appointees do they do with the approval of their masters.
On November 3, 2006 I made an Oregon Public Records Law demand for public documents from mayor Potter and commissioners Saltzman and Sten. To date there has been no response. More than sufficient time has passed to either produce the requested documents or affirm that no such documents exist. It is highly probable that mayor Potter and commissioner Sten have no documents matching my request. It is highly probable that commissioner Saltzman has fewer than half a dozen.
The letter below signature was mailed to Rhonda Meadows in a continuing and aggressive effort - including a Public Records Law demand - to dislodge public information regarding the members of the Portland Hope Meadows Corporation as well as its funding and financial data, all of which MUST be put on the public table for further examination and future action.
Mayor Potter, Commissioners Sten and Saltzman:
I have asked you twice, on October 23, 2006, before the John Ball school vote on Wednesday October 25, 2006 and after, on October 27, 2006, for the names and contact information for those on the Portland Hope Meadows board of directors, with the same results - No Response. You leave me no choice but to invoke the Public Records Law to prod from you what should have been placed voluntarily on the public table.
Brenda Krause-Eheart, Generations of Hope and the University of Illinois are all now complicit in support of Portland Hope Meadows' bullying attempt to force its way into a neighborhood in Portland, Oregon that doesn't want it. You are now part of a political imbroglio that will, in time, attract national attention. That focus will expose your willingness to trample on a fair and open political process thousands of miles from your homes. The reputations of the University of Illinois, its president, its sociology department, and its institute with ties to Generations of Hope will be tarnished.
The cost to give away two acres of public land to unidentified strangers - 1.4 million dollars. The cost to destroy a city's reputation for commitment to transparent, fair public process for decision making - Priceless.
Congress has a 16% approval rating because political tactics supersede the democratic process which involves well documented public debate on issues before a vote is cast. This deeply flawed and repugnant congressional model has been chosen by Tom Potter and Dan Saltzman who have made a back room deal involving the disposition and development of public property on the former John Ball school site. They are now trying to jam through Saltzman's pet project before there are competing plans on the table and without a full public discussion with all the proposals and data presented to the Portland Planning Commission, the public and the press for review. Does this behavior have your approval? Is this the kind of Oregon local government you can be proud of?
On Wednesday October 25 Portland city commissioner Dan Saltzman will try to shut off debate on the disposition and development of public property located at the John Ball school site before any competing proposals are allowed and before any serious analysis of the merits of his proposal are considered by the neighborhoods involved, the Portland Planning Commission, the press and the general public... If all of you do not act to STOP this reprehensible behavior, Brenda Krause-Eheart, Generations For Hope and the University of Illinois will be brought into the national spotlight.
The Housing Authority of Portland has officially informed Richard Ellmyer that he must deposit $10,000 in HAP's bank account before it will begin looking for public documents which contain statistical data on the age, gender, neighborhood, income and total number of its clients.
When an elected official(s) turns over the keys of the public treasury to UNelected citizens the voters and taxpayers of that community have a right to know who the elected official(s) is/are that have statutory oversight responsibility so that THEY can be held accountable for the financial decisions of those UNelected public officials who are spending the people's money.
There is an extraordinary amount of well documented evidence that American president Geroge W. Bush and Portland mayor Tom Potter have both chosen self-inflicted ignorance to make decisions, respectively, about the engagement and prosecution of a war in Iraq and a location policy for public housing clients in Multnomah county. More troublesome is that these elected officials continue to use their power to deny their constituents and colleagues critical information necessary for voters and other public officials to make informed, educated decisions. American democracy cannot thrive with this kind of public "leadership."
At a gathering of North Portland leaders last week, Jeff Cogen, candidate for Multnomah county commissioner, asked the question that a growing number of people in Multnomah county and Washington D.C. are asking, "Why is Portland's mayor, Tom Potter, continuing to withhold HAP's public statistical data from citizens, voters, taxpayers, elected officials, candidates for public office, academics, politicos and the press? It makes no sense." Exactly right Jeff. It makes no sense - unless it's a coverup of incompetence or wrongdoing.
HAP, PDC and HCDC will continue to contravene the city's so-called but non-existent policy of distribution not concentration of public housing clients by OVERLOADING the same certain few of the 117 neighborhoods within their jurisdictions until the Portland City Council tells them to stop.
The only thing standing between the unelected PDC and HAP commissioners from annually spending hundreds of millions of dollars of the public treasury on the wrong policies is Portland's mayor. Tom Potter has a fiduciary obligation to the citizens who elected him and those east of Portland who can't vote for Portland's mayor to guide, monitor and supervise how his appointees are spending our money.
HAP claims that it has 33,000 clients. Therefore, HAP MUST produce 33,000 client records that include age, gender, neighborhood and income.
After 16 months in office mayor Tom Potter has finally asked/ordered HAP to release a computer file with HAP's public data on it only to find out that he and HAP had LOST, that's right - LOST - 22,000 client files that are NOT on HAP's computer. That translates into about $66,000,000 of unconnected financial transactions with taxpayer funds. This is no longer merely mismanagement by HAP's board nor lax oversight of HAP's obviousoly abysmal bookkeeping practices, this is official evidence of a potential scandal that could push the alleged theft of $1.4 million by West Linn's former finance director right off the front page. Tom Potter may toss West Linn's mayor into the footnote category and bring home the olympic gold to Portland for most negligent and irresponsible public official in Oregon.
Oh Happy Day. Two candidates for the Multnomah County Commission, Ted Wheeler - County Chair, and Jeff Cogen - Commissioner District 2, have already sent requests for public housing data by neighborhood to HAP, the Housing Authority of Portland. They are ready to put the 3-6-9 Resolution on the county's public agenda to start the discussion of location policy of public housing clients. Jeff Cogen believes that every voter in Multnomah county should have they opportunity to vote for the person that appoints HAP commissioners who have control over placement of tens of thousands of public housing clients throughout Multnomah county. That means transferring the power from the mayor of Portland to the Multnomah County Chair.
No public official is more responsible for violating our public housing policy of distribution NOT concentration of public housing clients into a few select neighborhoods in Multnomah County and taking extraordinary and long term efforts to cover up the data that would reveal his fingerprints then Erik Sten.
Dear Mayor Potter:
My parents and teachers say that a good education teaches a student how to gather data then analyze the information to come to some conclusions about the subject. They said that the pupil could then use this research as the basis for informed discussions with others and the basis for personal action such as voting. Do you believe this? My father said that when you were a candidate for mayor you said that you believed that public officials needed good data to make good decisions. Do you still believe this?
Multnomah County Public Housing Czar and Portland Mayor Tom Potter has authorized the continued withholding of public housing data by neighborhood from elected public officials and candidates for public office. Shame on you Tom.
Ginny Burdick - candidate for Portland city council, Jeff Cogen - candidate for Multnomah county commission, Jim Robison - candidate for House Rep.#44 joined Sam Adams - Portland city commissioner in asking Housing Authority of Portland Chair Kandis Nunn to send them the following:
An authentic, accurate, complete and timely record for every HAP public housing client in the form of a tab delimited text file with the following four fields: neighborhood, median income range (0-30,31-50,51-80%), age and gender.
Like it or not, the reality is that those districts that are satisfied with their share of school funding and those public employees satisfied with their health care benefits are not going to easily or willingly change what they feel they "DESERVE."
As it turns out, the Multnomah County Public Housing Czar is actually Portland's mayor. Why is that? More importantly, Why should that continue to be?
Mayor Potter:
With all due respect, NONE of the information I requested has been provided. You are ill informed if you think so. Your staff is doing you a disservice and misguiding you on the facts as they have since you were elected. Neither you nor any of your staff have been willing to discuss this issue with me publicly or privately for almost a year. This is not the behavior of a mayor or staff that knows what they are doing and has the confidence to defend their positions in the court of public opinion. Your failure to send a letter to HAP immediately after your directive of January 26, 2005 to provide public housing data by neighborhood, made in front of HAP's Chair, Kandis Nunn, and two other HAP board members, Katie Such and Shar Giard, is damning evidence of incompetence or public disingenuousness.
"The mayor's office has contacted the housing authority of Portland to determine the feasibility of providing housing data by neighborhood association. I understand that's feasible. We'll send them a written request to follow up on that. That's another idea coming from Mr. Ellmyer. We appreciate that." Mayor Tom Potter, Portland City Council meeting January 26, 2005
The biggest mystery, however, is Tom Potter. Who is this man that as candidate sought votes by saying he supported public housing data by neighborhood, as mayor announced that HAP can and should provide public housing data by neighborhood and then NEVER followed up to make sure that his campaign promises and his orders as mayor were carried out?
The letter's language is still dancing around the same old tree. We need to move on. I do not hold you in any way responsible for this dilemma. You are staff. You do what you are told by your boss, Steve Rudman, and he does what he's told by his boss, Kandis Nunn and she does what she's told by our mayor, Tom Potter. This data standoff is really between Richard Ellmyer - and the 700,000 citizens of Multnomah county that he represents in this matter - and Tom Potter. In the end, Potter will either order, again, Kandis Nunn to deliver public housing data by neighborhood or he won't. It's that simple.
Not a single reader of HAP Watchers has written to me and made a case that my quest for public housing data by neighborhood is illegal, immoral or without justification. To the contrary. Many respond with a "keep up the good work." Most, however, simply cannot understand why HAP and the mayor haven't made this public data available ages ago. They are baffled by what they see as a no brainer.
Urban League of Portland leaders Charles Wilhoite, John Epstein, Lois Davis, Isaac Dixon, Karen Williams, Sonja Henning et. al. appear powerless to free public housing records by neighborhood as evidence to stop the concentration of low income public housing clients into a few select neighborhoods. May ask former ULP president, state senator Margaret Carter, to intercede and invoke Oregon Public Records Law.
Political writers Ryan Frank, Renee Mitchel, Nick Budnick, Anna Griffin, Nigel Jaquiss, Les Zaitz, Doug Bates, Jim Redden, Mark Zusman et. al. locked out of HAP's public data vault.
Neighborhood leaders Amanda Fritz - West Portland Park, Trudi Rahija - Hollywood, Scott Jensen - Portsmouth, Rick Sandstrom - Cathedral Park, Frank Bird - Northwest District, Cameron McCredie - Reed, Nancy Clark - Humboldt, Robin Plance - St. Johns et. al. denied access to their own neighborhood data.
Candidates Ted Wheeler, Diane Linn, Ginny Burdick, Erik Sten, Jeff Cogen, Jim Robison refused access to prisoners.
You missed the most important potential impediment to fair housing - Multnomah County's Public Housing Czar - Portland's mayor, Tom Potter.
Tom Potter came to the mayor's job with the same amount of knowledge, experience and interest in public housing policy as George W. Bush came to the president's job with knowledge, experience and interest in international affairs. Their willingness to honestly report the status and effects of their policy decisions as well as their actions purporting to deal forthrightly with the reality of the circumstances are not dissimilar. Their vulnerabilities are inevitably exploited by others with access to the seat of power.
Mayor Potter:
It's been four weeks since I made the request below. I haven't received so much as a Post-It note with scribbled text and numbers on it. I'd consider this neglect of duty, misconduct in office and inefficiency as defined in ORS 456.110. How about you? HAP's refusal to provide public housing data by neighborhood can only continue with your approval. It is most unlikely that your colleagues on the Portland city council or officials at HUD will be able to accept the upcoming AI report as credible, accurate and complete without the availability of public housing data by neighborhood from HAP. In addition, the Multnomah county press, candidates for public offices in Multnomah county and 700,000 citizens in Multnomah county - to use language from a past popular TV commercial, want to know, "Where's The Beef?"
Mayor Potter's disinterest in enforcing his own directive of January 26, 2005 to make available to the citizens of Multnomah county HAP's public housing data by neighborhood is now understandable. Shortly after that date Tom Potter joined the HAPsters in Never Never Land where there are no neighborhoods. There is obviously no need to provide monthly updates because nothing ever changes in HAPland. No need to provide data to others who don't reside in this intelligently designed realm of believers because those who live on the outside just wouldn't understand. It all makes perfect sense now.
So the question arises, does Portland's mayor, Tom Potter, know any more about what his appointed housing commissioners at HAP are up to than America's president, George W. Bush, knew about what his appointees at FEMA were thinking before hurricane Katrina?
You are invited to witness a brief 3rd birthday celebration for Multnomah county's first and only public housing data by neighborhood map at Portland city hall about 9:30 AM Wednesday September 7, 2005. At that time Richard Ellmyer will present to mayor Potter and commissioner Adams a large cake with the image of the map decorating its top.
Portland Mayor and Multnomah County Public Housing Czar Tom Potter has only one ally, Portland City Commissioner Sam Adams, in his announced, albeit unfulfilled, commitment to provide public housing data by neighborhood and to hold appointed public officials at HAP accountable for their actions. The Gresham City Council, the Multnomah County Commission and three of five members of the Portland City Council say NO.
Mayor Tom Potter's 29 Housing Commissioners spent $100,000,000 of our money on public housing in Multnomah county during Potter's first six months in office and Tom doesn't have a clue how or where it went.
Commissioner Sten:
Although you have no authority to compel, as the mayor can, any action from any of the twenty-nine housing commissioners that govern HAP, HCDC and PDC you (and your colleagues on the Portland and Gresham city councils and the Multnomah county commission) can still request action. Therefore, I am asking you to publicly request the following:
In a rare moment of stunning clarity HAP was recently forced to admit the secret and disturbing revelations that it does not keep individual computer records of every client nor does it include in every record that it does have a field of information which identifies the client's level of median income - a basic requirement for HAP status. As a result of this inexcusably inadequate record keeping HAP CANNOT produce accurate and meaningful public housing data by neighborhood
When I previously suggested that perhaps the reason HAP wouldn't provide public housing data by neighborhood was because their records were in shambles and they couldn't, I was half joking. This is serious. This is a disaster. This is a scandal.
Mayor Potter has been conned by HAP's Chair, Kandis Nunn, into believing that it will take from nine months to a year to add a neighborhood field to each of HAP's client records in its computer database. Total Crap.
The mayor can assign all the bureaus to other members of the city council. But, he cannot assign his statutory authority to nominate and dismiss (ORS 456.110) the twenty-nine public housing commissioners at HAP, PDC and HCDC, which are responsible only to him and serve at his pleasure.
TO: HAP Director, Policy and Public Affairs
On or before June 14th, a reasonable and sufficient time for you to respond to my request, I will expect to receive from you one of the following:
On September 7, 2004 HAP Chair Kandis Nunn and the entire board of the Housing Authority of Portland were informed that WHOEVER became mayor on January 1, 2005 would require HAP to provide public housing information by neighborhood. That data could have and should have been on the mayor's desk the day he arrived at city hall.
It is not very difficult to geocode the addresses onto a GIS layer and assign the neighborhood name by location. I would not be surprised if the Portland city staff who operate portlandmaps.com could complete the entire task in under an hour. Sorry Tom, but there must be some reason other than technical capability that is delaying HAP's ability to provide this data.
There are only TWO ways to produce the minimally acceptable public housing data by neighborhood. Method one - Manually. Method two - By Computer Script.
Portland's mayor, Tom Potter, is headed for an embarrassing failure of HAP scholarship and elected leadership. Without your help it is likely that by the Potter administration's six month anniversary and deadline for his Public Housing Policy 101 final exam, June 30, 2005, what little credibility Tom had with respect to his role as Multnomah County Public Housing Policy Czar will have been squandered.
Multnomah County Journalists:
As all of you well know, I have been in a battle with the mayor of Portland and the Housing Authority of Portland for more than four years trying to get the fundamental information required to defend Portland's policy of distribution not concentration of public housing clients into a few select neighborhoods in Multnomah county. On January 26, 2005 mayor Potter publicly told HAP Chair Kandis Nunn to prepare HAP's public housing data by neighborhood. Does it concern or interest you that after eighteen weeks there is no available public evidence that this data is now or will be accessible anytime in the foreseeable future to the press or the public?
My Fellow Neighborhood Activists:
For more than four years I have been trying very hard to persuade the Housing Authority of Portland and Portland's mayor to provide public housing data by neighborhood. I have written more than eighty HAP Watcher commentaries to keep you informed of my progress
Over more than four years of writing HAP Watcher commentaries I have often received questions from readers asking about public housing data from Gresham neighborhoods. A recent increase in those inquiries has prompted me to answer that question to those of you who are leaders in the Gresham community.
To: Journalists of Multnomah County - Sometime after July 1st I will be writing a HAP Watcher commentary focused entirely on mayor Potter's record regarding public housing policy during his first six months in office. I would like your help in pulling this article together.
What we need is less invitation to citizen participation from Portland's mayor and more demonstration that Multnomah County's Public Housing Czar knows and shows that he is in control of his twenty-nine subordinate public housing appointees
To: Kandis Nunn, Chair, Housing Authority of Portland
On January 26, 2005 you were told by mayor Potter during a public Portland City Council meeting to provide HAP's public housing data by neighborhood. As of May 9, 2005 there continues to be no public evidence to prove that you have complied with that order.
120 days and 67 million taxpayer dollars later, Portland Mayor and Multnomah County Public Housing Czar, Tom Potter, has failed to prove that he knows what he's doing or can handle his statutory responsibility with regards to public housing policy in Multnomah county.
In January I sent you an email listing a number of questions regarding Mayor Potter's handling of public housing policy that needed to be answered next May. Since then many people have asked me, "How's Potter doing?" In response to these numerous legitimate inquiries I have rephrased my concerns into a test format that should make it easier for everyone to evaluate the mayor's performance with regard to public housing policy.
Catherine Such and Shar Giard are now Tom Potter's appointees. So the question arises, will either or both of these public housing commissioners fail the standards set by statute, "neglect of duty, inefficiency etc." or by whatever standards Mayor Tom Potter has personally set ("homophobe?, pedophile?, child rapist?" [see public testimony 1-26-05]) to continue in office?
On Wednesday January 26th at 9:30 AM we shall see if Tom Potter starts down the right public housing policy path by establishing his authority over HAP, HCDC and PDC and taking responsibility for the actions of the twenty-nine housing commissioners that serve at his pleasure or if he choses to continue with business as usual, ignoring history and following in the failed public housing policy footsteps of his predecessor.
Below are the answers to some fundamental public housing policy questions by candidate for Portland city council Sam Adams. You will not find answers by candidate Nick Fish. The ubiquitous Mr. Fish is happy to dispense platitudes to the crowd and cheerily hit the odd softball lobbed by inexperienced and ill-informed journalists. But when it comes to facing the music with someone who knows the score better than he does, Nick Fish swims away as if frightened by a predator.
On September 3, 2004 I spent an hour or more with each mayoral candidate, Tom Potter and Jim Francesconi, discussing a single subject, public housing policy in Portland, Multnomah county and Metro's regional jurisdiction. The responses below are either quotes or paraphrases that catch the spirit of their answers. The most gratifying result of these conversations was the realization that both candidates emerged with a greater understanding of their potential role as mayor regarding public housing policy.
Asking candidates for public office where they stand on public policy issues is YOUR business. It's YOUR job to ask the questions and then tell us the answers. It's what readers expect. And you're not delivering any more than the politicians you chastise. The Oregonian's reluctance to examine the issue of public housing policy, both within (editorial) and without (reporting) is indefensible, unprofessional and a disservice to your readers and our community.
If you vote to spend a new dime of public funds in any neighborhood that already has six percent (6%) public housing clients you will be identified as voting for concentration of public housing and against the livability standards of the neighborhoods that have already done their fair share.
I welcome any elected or appointed official in the state of Oregon or any member of the Oregon press corps to publicly challenge my table with one of their own.
This summer citizens of Multnomah county will have the extremely rare opportunity to speak out and influence a public policy matter normally made inaccessible to them. For the first time Multnomah county voters will have a chance to "cast a vote" in favor of a public housing policy which is transparent, understandable and accountable to taxpayers.
Planning Director Kellley Tricks Auditor - Housing Data "Disappears" 6-14-04
Government accountability for connecting public housing goals with expenditures turns out to be a shared objective of Gary Blackmer, the Portland City Auditor, and myself. On June 5, 2002 City Auditor Gary Blackmer issued an immensely important ground breaking report on the relationship between housing goals and public expenditures at BHCD, PDC and HAP.
Hi Tom Potter, Jim Francesconi, Sam Adams and Nick Fish:
Below is a Bill of Particulars regarding the removal of HAP commissioners which was formally presented to mayor Katz on April 27, 2004. ORS 456.ll0 states that a commissioner can be removed by the mayor, "For inefficiency or neglect of duty or misconduct in office." The arguments at the end of this email make the case.
Hi Tom Potter, Jim Francesconi, Sam Adams, Nick Fish:
Congratulations on making it to round two of our election process on the path to Portland's City Hall. In the next five and a half months you will have ample opportunity to discuss and debate the one major subject noticeably and disturbingly absent from the first part of your campaigns, namely, public housing.
PGE, HAP And Katz Spurn Greening Of Columbia Villa 5-3-04
The question is not what WAS built at Columbia Villa but rather what COULD have and SHOULD have been built.
HAP Commissioners Failing Accountability Test Must Be Fired 4-27-04
Mayor Katz:
This is a formal request to remove from public office the following Housing Authority of Portland commissioners:
Jeff Bachrach, Harriet Cormack, Richard Fernandez , Shar Giard, Chris Lassen, Lee Moore, Kandis Brewer Nunn, Howard Shapiro, Antoinette Teixeira.
It is a given that citizens who chose to be elected or appointed to public office want to make public policy. That is the job. Public housing policy involves the lives and businesses of 700,000 citizens in 117 neighborhoods in Multnomah county. More importantly, it involves the expenditure of $217,500,000 of public funds, i.e. taxpayer dollars. You are a player in this game and your constituents, your colleagues and the press expect you to have and to express an opinion on this subject.
Do you support a public housing policy goal for all of Multnomah county's 117 neighborhoods that establishes SIX PERCENT of the total population of any and every neighborhood to include public housing clients with no neighborhood having fewer than THREE PERCENT and no neighborhood having more than NINE PERCENT of public housing clients?
We no longer rely on a page in the Voter's Pamphlet and a postcard from candidates to tell us where they stand on the issues. A candidate's web site can and should now tell us everything we need to know to make an informed choice.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that HAP will build all, most or even some of the hundreds of structures at Columbia Villa for low-income public housing clients to the highest "green" standards without the pressure of a third party overseer.
The decision to sell public land, the number, size and cost of the for sale homes is entirely the product and responsibility of the HAP board. These were and are ALL PUBLIC POLICY DECISIONS relating to real public property.
Kandis Brewer Nunn is now the public official in charge of the Housing Authority of Portland. Ms. Nunn is Chairperson of a quasi-governmental organization that affects the lives, property values and businesses of 700,000 residents in 117 neighborhoods of Multnomah county and 35,000 HAP clients. Ms. Nunn presides over a $90,000,000 publicly funded budget which is larger than 70% of the counties in the state of Oregon (25 of 36). Ms. Nunn presides over a $90,000,000 publicly funded budget which is larger than 95% of the cities in the state of Oregon (229 of 240). Ms. Nunn, an appointed public official, has more budgetary power than about 1,000 elected officials in the state of Oregon. Any public official, elected or appointed, with a $90,000,000 checkbook of taxpayer dollars must be held accountable.
You are a public official. You have been appointed to the board of the the Housing Authority of Portland, a quasi-governmental public body which has the authority to spend $90,000,000 of taxpayers money in FY2004. You are the board Treasurer of an organization that has a bigger public budget than 70% of the counties in the state of Oregon (25 of 36). You are the board Treasurer of an organization that has a bigger public budget than 95% of the cities in the state of Oregon (229 of 240). And you want to remain anonymous and shielded from the public? Preposterous.
Candidates should expect to be asked this question during and after the campaign until such time as the EVIDENCE proves that program results and policy goals do, in fact, match. Keep in mind that without neighborhood map based accounting there can be no evidence.
Candidates should expect to be asked this question during and after the campaign until such time as the EVIDENCE proves that program results and policy goals do, in fact, match. Keep in mind that without neighborhood map based accounting there can be no evidence.
Sam Adams and Tom Potter's answers support public policy positions that are clearly in the interest of the citizens of Portland and Multnomah county. They support free speech and citizen access to government leaders. Adams and Potter quite correctly and responsibly say they want government to provide evidence that the results of its housing practices match the goals of its public housing policies.
Contrary to the protestations of Ralph Nader, the election of George W. Bush proved with frightening clarity that it does make a difference who gets elected to public office. Or, in this case, who gets appointed to public office.
On Wednesday January 7th I asked all of you, candidates for public office, for "your reactions to the recent stealth nominating PROCESS (NOT the appointee) of Harriet Cormack to the HAP board." The deadline for responding is 2:30 PM Tuesday January 13th.
The Portland City Council, Vera Katz - Erik Sten - Jim Francesconi - Dan Saltzman - Randy Leonard, has committed a dishonorable and unethical act by surreptitiously appointing Harriet Cormack to the board of the Housing Authority of Portland during a major holiday week without notifying the public the press or those who made written requests to testify.
There are very few members of the press, politicos or HAP watchers in the state of Oregon who did not know that Richard Ellmyer twice requested an opportunity to testify before the Portland City Council regarding the appointment of a new board member to the Housing Authority of Portland. It is undemocratic and an insult to me that all of you have ignored my legitimate request and attempted to deny my basic right as a citizen to testify on a public matter. Shame on all of you.
The city of Portland does not need a dishonest slippery tongued lawyer/politician on its council. Portlanders, like everybody else, want women and men to lead our community who will honestly tell us what they believe before we decide to vote for them. There are many many more legitimate inquires to be made about Nick Fish's behavior as a HAP board member. We hope his answers to those questions bare a greater resemblance to the truth. So far Nick Fish doesn't make the grade.
I welcome to become new neighbors in my Portsmouth neighborhood every race, every ethnic minority, every sexual orientation, every gender, every person with or without a religious belief - including Arab Muslims, every height, every weight, even Republicans, in fact, absolutely any person or family, natural or extended, that can comfortably afford to buy a $200,000 and up house. The diversity I support at the Villa and throughout my neighborhood is ECONOMIC DIVERSITY.
At a public Board meeting on November 18, 2003 from 6:15 PM to 6:18 PM the entire Housing Authority of Portland Board HEARD the following testimony:
I look forward to a public motion by HAP Commissioner Nick Fish to direct the HAP staff to construct a neighborhood based map of HAP client locations which will be placed on the HAP web site and updated quarterly and letters from HAP Commissioner Nick Fish to the Portland city council and the PDC board requesting similar actions.
Renee Mitchell, Oregonian columnist, continues to renew our american faith in the value of a free press. Mitchell does her homework, gets the facts right, shows insight, demonstrates a genuine commitment to the well being of our community and tempers a sharp style with humor. Her recent column regarding Richard Ellmyer's role in bringing the issue of public housing policy to the public agenda, If you dismiss messenger, you miss the point, is an excellent example.
In a move to bring cameras to commissions* that will certainly add "hypocrite" to "bully"* and other pejorative descriptors used by some to define a certain Portland City Commissioner, Randy Leonard has just "awakened" to the notion that public Boards and Commissions need more public access. Hallelujah Brother Randy, Hallelujah, Hallelujah.
Homelessness is a disgrace upon America. It should be the first priority for every housing authority or related agency in Oregon. The Oregonian is right to call attention to this tragic yet fixable problem. However, before any more federal or any other kind of public housing dollars are spent in Multnomah county our community needs to have a public discussion entitled, "Where Do We Put Them."